On Tue, 2007-01-02 at 11:53 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 28. Dezember 2006 18:57 schrieb Bruce Momjian:
> > I think you can make the case that this should be an error, or at least
> > that's how it got on the TODO list.  I can always remove it if people
> > don't want the item completed.
> The reason this was added is that modular applications expect that a locally 
> issued BEGIN ... COMMIT executes a transaction, whereas now you don't know 
> what you're getting.  I think this change would have merit.

Interesting point. My only comment is, "Do it one way or the other,
don't give me a user or a distribution packager a foot gun."

E.g., no GUC parameter. Just change the behavior or don't.

Joshua D. Drake


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to