Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IIRC Tom's main objection to the previous proposal was that it involved large grammar changes, which I understand is not now proposed.

No, they're already in there --- the patch seems to have been written
according to that proposal despite the objections.

Oh. ouch.

That seems strange given this query from Oleg back on 18 Nov:

So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in core ?



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to