Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ISTM that we would get the effect your looking for by just moving the > xl_tot_len field to the end, and only storing it for records with backup > blocks:
I like that formulation better --- seems like less change-for-the-sake-of-change. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster