Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ISTM that we would get the effect your looking for by just moving the 
> xl_tot_len field to the end, and only storing it for records with backup 
> blocks:

I like that formulation better --- seems like less
change-for-the-sake-of-change.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to