Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to see still more evidence that it's a problem before we start 
> changing that piece of code. It has served us well for years.

What I see here is mostly evidence suggesting that we should consider
raising NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS, rather than anything more invasive.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to