Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 11:34:23AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Martijn van Oosterhout <> writes:
>>> That's true, but I think it would be worthwhile to invert the switch to
>>> be --disable-thread-safety, since the number of people who don't
>>> understand the problem far outweigh the cost of the switch.
>> I'd vote against that unless it were done only for Linux, and personally
>> I think a platform-dependent default for this might be unreasonably
>> confusing.
> Well, it's already platform specific, Win32 removes the option
> altogether (apparently). Which would be another option.

Visual C build only, not the MingW build. It still has the option. The
win32 binary distribution sets it though.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to