On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 04:22:43PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> (A) I'm not sure we would have heard about it, and (B) any one user is
> probably only using a subset of what has been proposed to be loaded by
> default, so the odds of collisions would go way up.

As a data point, some time ago (7.2 days) I used to do this as a
matter of completeness, and never had a collision.  


Andrew Sullivan  | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If they don't do anything, we don't need their acronym.
                --Josh Hamilton, on the US FEMA

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to