Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
>> Is this a known problem? Is there any test procedure that builds the
>> "base" distribution before release?
>
> Most of the core team is convinced that the postgresql-foo tarballs are
> useless, but Marc insists on keeping them. But since they are nearly
> useless, no one tests them, so it is not surprising that they don't
> work.
Why do we keep them again? I can't recall at any point in the life of
CMD us ever using the -foo tarballs. Not to mention they just take up space.
Let's dump them.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
