Warren Turkal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 22 February 2007 00:05, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Not particularly. We keep hearing from various advocates that
>> $foo-is-better-than-CVS, but the preferred value of $foo changes with
>> amazing frequency, and none of the arguments seem to justify the pain
>> of converting.

> Some of the other options just seem to have much nicer user interfaces. I was 
> playing with Bacula and they just changed to Subversion. It really is much 
> nicer than the CVS they used to use. Git seems interesting as well. I guess 
> Subversion and git are the two big ones right now. What would you look for if 
> you were to check out new SCMSes? Would you want distributed like Git or 
> centralized like CVS/Subversion?

I think you just made my point for me.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to