Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never 
> >actually implemented. It's dead code.
> >
> >Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword
> >>
> >>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>What am I missing?
> >>>Seems, it's about that
> >>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php
> Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)

So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for
future readers as well ;-)

Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to