Simon Riggs wrote: > > > wondered why that proposal had been overlooked, so I started a separate > > > thread to ensure that the idea was discussed. That seems very similar to > > > many of your own posts. > > > > True, but usually I don't see the breakage. > > Sorry, I just meant you summarise ideas that others have made, not that > your proposals are broken.
My proposals are often broken. > > What concerned me is you > > saw some of the breakage, but still went ahead with the proposal. > > I have never and will never propose something I know to be broken. That > shouldn't need to be said, but I've had to say that more than once > recently for some reason. Why would you even think that the author of > PITR would harbour some hidden disrespect for server integrity, or > somebody who overhauled the standards compliance documentation, with > Troels, has no respect for standards? I was merely trying to focus us on making sure we stay on track. I know you share the same goals. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
