On 2/27/07, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before we rehash recent debates, please, everybody, review them. Going over and over and over the same ground laboriously is really getting tiresome, and unfortunately it's also getting more frequent. It's *déjà vu *all over again.
History does tend to repeat itself, doesn't it? I just assumed it was never discussed based on Josh's response. database is appropriate and when it isn't. If we put it into a tracking
system (presumably database backed) that would be another matter, but that has gone nowhere as usual.
A tracking system is what I was referring to, if it didn't have a front-end then it would be quite pointless to have it in a database. Honestly, I think Trac even does this, but I am far from familiar with that tool -- I have just seen other projects with "roadmap" items which categorized TODO tasks into future releases. There is some point in putting it in a wiki where we can gather relevant
documents, links to discussions etc. That's why the developers' wiki was established, AIUI.
To be honest, it may be adequate to maintain this solely through the Wiki. The only thing I see lacking is specifically who is handling tasks, and what release it is planned for. Perhaps, I am just looking in the wrong place?