Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>> On 2/27/07, Josh Berkus <> wrote:
>>>>> I see no reason to implement it if there is no performance gain.
>> However, I strongly concur that we need at least some evidence. It could
>> easily be that a misstep in the code, causes a loop over the wrong set
>> and all the performance we thought we would get is invalid, not because
>> of theory or what should happen, but because of actual implementation.
> It rather sounds like you're asking for a proof that Simon can write bug-free
> code before you allow him to write any code.

Well wouldn't that be great! :) but no, not quite. I would just like to
see some metrics showing that it is a benefit. Besides the patch needs
to work for the metrics to be run.

Joshua D. Drake



      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to