Neil Conway wrote: > On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 16:20 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > Thus we may literally not have rights to the code. Do you really want to > > go down the path of in 2 years, Fujitsu (No offense Fujitsu), but you > > are the topic) decides that the code they provided is owned by them and > > they didn't give us permission? > > For the case in question, sure, requiring some clarification from FJ > would be reasonable. But more broadly, my point is that I think you're > fooling yourself if you think that requiring a disclaimer or explicit > transfer of copyright for this *one* particular patch is likely to make > any material difference to the overall copyright status of the code > base.
Yes, I do. If there is an explicit claim, like an email footer or a copyright in the code, we do try to nail that down. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
