Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a better way than going to time_t and back?

Isn't the standard SQL-level locution
        timestamptz + numeric_value * '1 second'::interval
?  I'm not sure what would be the most convenient realization
of this at the C level, but please stay away from time_t ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to