Simon Riggs wrote: > > As a result of the issues, I think Pavan is playing safe, to make sure > there is *an* option, so that we can build upwards from there. The > proposal is pragmatism only, while we discuss other approaches. >
Absolutely true. I agree that CHILLing the table with AccessExclusive lock is not a solution that I like. I was looking at it just as a stop-gap solution, given the time left for feature freeze. But if there is something better that we can do, I am for it. Thanks, Pavan -- EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
