Simon Riggs wrote:
> As a result of the issues, I think Pavan is playing safe, to make sure
> there is *an* option, so that we can build upwards from there. The
> proposal is pragmatism only, while we discuss other approaches.

Absolutely true. I agree that CHILLing the table with AccessExclusive
lock is not a solution that I like. I was looking at it just as a
stop-gap solution, given the time left for feature freeze.
But if there is something better that we can do, I am for it.




---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to