Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> missing BYTE_ORDER definition for Solaris                            | 
>> 2007-01-10 14:18:23 |     1

> What is this BYTE_ORDER macro? Should I be using it instead of the
> AC_C_BIGENDIAN test in configure for the packed varlena patch?

Actually, if we start to rely on AC_C_BIGENDIAN, I'd prefer to see us
get rid of direct usages of BYTE_ORDER.  It looks like only
contrib/pgcrypto is depending on it today, but we've got lots of
cruft in the include/port/ files supporting that.

>> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test                            | 
>> 2007-02-10 03:00:02 |     3

> Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable?

It's fixed.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to