Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I just realized that I need to check every usage of typtype to be
> > sure that the enums patch is sane.  So, barring objection, I intend
> > to take this opportunity to make the code stop referring directly
> > to 'b', 'c' etc whereever possible.  Any objections to these names?
> >
> > #define     TYPTYPE_BASE            'b'
> > #define     TYPTYPE_COMPOSITE       'c'
> > #define     TYPTYPE_DOMAIN          'd'
> > #define     TYPTYPE_ENUM            'e'
> > #define     TYPTYPE_PSEUDO          'p'
> I like macros.  ;-)

Why not enums? ;-)

Peter Eisentraut

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to