On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:14:41AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > . defer for the present any consideration of a "CREATE TYPE foo AS ARRAY > ..." command.
What is the rationale for allowing people to name the array type. When I originally proposed the syntax I presumed that the array name would be kept internal and hidden from the user, just that it would exist after that command. What possible reason is there for allowing the user to give the array type a name? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature