Naz Gassiep wrote:
I believe the suggestion was to have an automated process that only ran
on known, sane patches.

How do we know in advance of reviewing them that they are sane?

What is more, we often run into situations where patch a will require changes in patch b, so testing them individually against CVS is not likely to be terribly useful.

Frankly, our problems are not primarily technological. They have to do mainly with scarcity of available time from competent reviewers. No amount of automation will fix that.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to