Naz Gassiep wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Naz Gassiep wrote:
I believe the suggestion was to have an automated process that only ran
on known, sane patches.
How do we know in advance of reviewing them that they are sane?
Same way as happens now.

The question was rhetorical ... there is no list of "certified sane but unapplied" patches. You are proceeding on the basis of a faulty understanding of how our processes work.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to