[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Dunstan) writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> So in a roundabout way we come back >> to the idea that we need a bug tracker (NOT a patch tracker), plus >> people putting in the effort to make sure it stays a valid source >> of up-to-date info. Without the latter it won't really be useful.
> Hallelujah Brother! > > BTW, a bug tracker can be used as a patch tracker, although the > reverse isn't true. For example, the BZ people use BZ that way, in > fact - most patches arrive as attachments to bugs. And trackers can be > used just as well for tracking features as well as bugs. Well, Command Prompt set up a Bugzilla instance specifically so people could track PG bugs. If only someone took interest and started using it... -- "cbbrowne","@","linuxfinances.info" http://cbbrowne.com/info/lisp.html Do Roman paramedics refer to IV's as "4's"? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
