On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 06:44:12AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Magnus Hagander wrote: > > > As an example, how is patch information going to help us review HOT or > > > group-item-index? There is frankly more information about these in the > > > archives than someone could reasonable read. What someone needs is a > > > summary of where we are now on the patches, and lots of time. > > > > > > FYI, Tom, Heikki, I need one of you to post the list of patches and > > > where we think we are on each one, even if the list is imperfect. > > > > I think you just contradicted yourself. Information isn ot the problem, but > > you need more information... > > > > I think this is a fairly clear indication that we do need a better way to > > track this information. > > No, my point is that 100% information is already available by looking at > email archives.
Yes, and hard to find. > What we need is a short description of where we are on > each patch --- that is a manual process, not something that can be > automated. Right. But it can be presented in a central way and incrementally updated. > Tom has posted it --- tell me how we will get such a list in an > automated manner. There's no way to get it automated, but you can get it incrementally updated. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate