Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:02:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >  
> >>Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>    
> >>>If all we want to do is add a check that prevents two servers to start on
> >>>the same port, we could do that trivially in a win32 specific way (since
> >>>we'll never have unix sockets there). Just create an object in the global
> >>>namespace named postgresql.interlock.<portnumber> or such a thing.
> >>>      
> >>Does it go away automatically on postmaster crash?
> >
> >Yes.
> Then I think it's worth adding, and I'd argue that as a low risk safety 
> measure we should allow it to sneak into 8.3. I'm assuming the code 
> involved will be quite small.

Do you actually mean 8.2 here?

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to