-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, May 16, 2007 10:36:42 -0500 "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:33:38AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Someone (you, I think) advocated a '3 weeks and then dump the rest of the >> patches' (not quote as strong of wording, but similar) ... why not split >> the patches list up: >> >> submitted patches, not reviewed >> reviewed patches, needs work, waiting on author >> reviewed patches, ready for commit. >> >> Once feature freeze started, the first list should only get small patches to >> it, easily reviewed and committed ... then, focus on reviewing list A and >> move the patch to list B or commit it ... once list A is cleared off, we go >> into Beta ... if a patch on list B gets re-submitted before Beta, it gets >> reviewed and either committed, or punt'd to the next release ... > > I don't think we want to be adding anything new in beta. But if we went > into 'alpha' when list A is cleared that might work. > > (BTW, it's not really clear which list "A" is...) List A is the 'unreviewed patches list', which, on Feature Freeze, would be 'closed' ... Feature Freeze would last until all Patches in List A are processed, whether that means going back to the Author for fixes/work, or gets committed to the source tree ... Once List A is cleared off, then we dive into Beta, at which point in time only bug fixes would be applied ... - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGSyp14QvfyHIvDvMRAjIHAJ9MKdROk7Mh0EvcpJoJJJ4uY6iKSQCgldFS ZAYrJ08nKewt1fZbXnXUeN8= =Huf8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster