Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This is even better than our archives due to the problem that the
>> archives don't have links to messages crossing month boundaries.  Have
>> you noticed that if you go to the archives, some discussions appear
>> truncated at a point, but you can go to the archive for the next month
>> and it continues there?  I find that artifact somewhat annoying.  The
>> bug report would continue receiving the CC'ed mails, so it would record
>> them all in a single place.

> Not crossing month boundaries is super-annoying.

Indeed, but that should be fixed.  I can't imagine that one
presumably-fixable deficiency is grounds for changing our entire
discussion infrastructure.  Or do you think we will find something
else that has no deficiencies of its own?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to