Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On 5/17/07, Cui Shijun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I want to help the reviewing work of "ctid chain following enhancement ".
> > I've been studying the souce code which related with that part recently.
> > :-)
> Tom had objected to this patch on the grounds that it adds complexity
> without any significant gains. Though I don't completely agree with the
> first part, the second part is indeed debatable since the code is touched
> only
> for infrequently.

Right.  The reason the patch was kept in the queue is that there was
discussion that HOT will exercise that part of the code a lot more than
it does currently.

  Bruce Momjian  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to