On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:31:54AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > The situation with this patch is that I now have it in a state where I > think it could be applied, but there is one blocker, namely that we do > not have a way of preventing the interleaving of log messages from > different backends, which leads to garbled logs. This is an existing > issue about which we have had complaints, but it becomes critical for a > facility the whole purpose of which is to provide logs in a format > guaranteed to work with our COPY command.
The whole semantics of PIPEBUF should prevent garbling, as long as each write is a complete set of lines and no more than PIPEBUF bytes long. Have we determined the actual cause of the garbling? Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature