Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
What's wrong with synchronous_commit?  It's accurate and simple.


That is fine too.

My concern would be that it can be read two ways:
1. When you commit, sync (something or other - unspecified)
2. Synchronise commits (to each other? to something else?)*

It's obvious to people on the -hackers list what we're talking about, but is it so clear to a newbie, perhaps non-English speaker?

* I can see people thinking this means something like "commit_delay".

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to