Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Did you check that the observed performance for non-usleep-using scripts >> didn't change? If this extra overhead causes a reduction in reported >> TPS rates it would make it hard to compare older and newer tests.
> I keep wondering, why is that important? If you want to compare results > of different PG versions, surely you can run the tests with the newest > version of pgbench? It's more about not having to repeat old test cases every time you want to have numbers comparable to your latest case. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly