Well. Ok. Then I'll just do it myself. Just thought it would be good for thousands of users. As I said, it was just a suggestion. I surely aint the only one who ever thought about it.
Thanks anyway. 2007/7/31, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Rafael, > > > This is just a PLUS. I just don't see any problem by doing this. > > Even knowing that this is not Standard SQL-Syntax, I just see this as a > > benefit feature. > > Our project has a policy of upholding the SQL standard whereever possible. > For that reason, we don't approve non-standard syntax just for reasons of > accessibility. Any non-standard syntax we approve needs to add > significant extra functionality to the DBMS, not just convenience, and > certainly not because MySQL does it. > > "Standards are important" is one of the themes of PostgreSQL which > differentiates us from MySQL. > > > Another reason is that we have more people migrating from MySQL to > > Postgre than any other database server. People don't migrate to Postgre > > from Oracle. Hardly from MS SQL Server. > > You're mistaken. I think we get more migrations from Oracle than from > MySQL. And quite a few from DB2 and Informix. > > -- > --Josh > > Josh Berkus > PostgreSQL @ Sun > San Francisco > -- Atenciosamente, Rafael Azevedo .: Diretor :: WEBPRO SOLUÇÕES DIGITAIS :: Telefone: 51 3266.3446 :: Celular: 51 9243.9893 :: http://www.webpro.com.br :: Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :: Conheça o MAILMAN, Solução em E-mail Marketing :: http://www.mailman.com.br/
