"Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> There seems fairly clear use-case for allowing A-Z a-z 0-9 and >> underscore (while CVS head rejects 0-9 and underscore).
> The problem with allowing uppercase letters is that on some > filesystems foo and Foo are the same file, and on others they are not. > This may lead to obscure portability problems where code worked fine > on Unix and then fails when the database is running on Windows. Yeah, good point. So far it seems that a-z 0-9 and underscore cover the real use-cases, so what say we just allow those for now? It's a lot easier to loosen up later than tighten up ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match