"Ben Tilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/3/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There seems fairly clear use-case for allowing A-Z a-z 0-9 and
>> underscore (while CVS head rejects 0-9 and underscore).

> The problem with allowing uppercase letters is that on some
> filesystems foo and Foo are the same file, and on others they are not.
>  This may lead to obscure portability problems where code worked fine
> on Unix and then fails when the database is running on Windows.

Yeah, good point.  So far it seems that a-z 0-9 and underscore cover the
real use-cases, so what say we just allow those for now?  It's a lot
easier to loosen up later than tighten up ...

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to