Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I think we'd need to have a complete solution is
>>
>> convert(text, name) returns bytea
>> -- convert from DB encoding to arbitrary encoding
>>
>> convert(bytea, name, name) returns bytea
>> -- convert between any two encodings
>>
>> convert(bytea, name) returns text
>> -- convert from arbitrary encoding to DB encoding
>>
>> The second and third would need to do a verify step before
>> converting, of course.
> Is there any reason these functions shouldn't be marked immutable?
No, not as long as DB encoding is frozen...
> I'm wondering if we should give them disambiguating names, rather than
> call them all convert.
No. We have a function overloading system, we should use it.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
