We previously discussed compressing the numeric data type for small values:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-06/msg00715.php

We didn't do this for 8.3 but in any case Tom did suggest we ought to reverse
the weight and sign/dscale so we could do this sometime without introducing
another incompatibility.

I think we also should move the NumericData and declaration to numeric.c and
make the Numeric type an opaque pointer for the rest of the source tree. That
will catch any contrib modules or third-party modules which would be broken by
any new data representation.


--- numeric.h   27 Feb 2007 23:48:10 +0000      1.24
+++ numeric.h   24 Sep 2007 16:07:24 +0100      
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
 typedef struct NumericData
 {
        int32           vl_len_;                /* varlena header (do not touch 
directly!) */
-       int16           n_weight;               /* Weight of 1st digit  */
        uint16          n_sign_dscale;  /* Sign + display scale */
+       int16           n_weight;               /* Weight of 1st digit  */
        char            n_data[1];              /* Digits (really array of 
NumericDigit) */
 } NumericData;
 


-- 
  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

                http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Reply via email to