On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 10:05:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Do we expect there might be more like this? We could easily add a rule > > to Install.pm to know about DICTFILES rules in addition to DATA > > rules.. > > Yeah, after sleeping on it I think we need a general-purpose solution. > There are likely to be more not fewer tsearch-related contrib modules > in future; and even if you don't believe that, people will certainly > want to use the PGXS infrastructure to build add-on dictionaries. > So we should provide a DATA-like macro to specify installing stuff > into $SHAREDIR/tsearch_data/, instead of making everyone reinvent the > hack that's currently in dict_xsyn/Makefile. > > I was going to propose calling it DATA_TSEARCH, but DICTFILES would > work too. Any preferences?
DATA_TSEARCH seems better, it indicates where the files are going even clearer. //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly