Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
>>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
>>> not support).
>> I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
>> way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
>> may not be a good thing).
> Why not "if selected encoding is UTF8, drop any .nnn part"?
> (Inside #ifdef WIN32 of course.)

Consistency? It is better than the current situation though I agree.

Regards, Dave

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to