Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or >>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does >>> not support). > >> I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean >> way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or >> may not be a good thing). > > Why not "if selected encoding is UTF8, drop any .nnn part"? > (Inside #ifdef WIN32 of course.)
Advertising
Consistency? It is better than the current situation though I agree. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
