On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
> >>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
> >>> not support).
> >
> >> I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
> >> way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
> >> may not be a good thing).
> >
> > Why not "if selected encoding is UTF8, drop any .nnn part"?
> > (Inside #ifdef WIN32 of course.)
>
> Consistency? It is better than the current situation though I agree.
As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
WIN1252 database...
//Magnus
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
