On 10/22/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trevor Talbot wrote:

> > I'd probably take the approach of combining win32_waitpid() and
> > threads.  You'd end up with 1 thread per 64 backends; when something
> > interesting happens the thread could push the info onto a queue, which
> > the new win32_waitpid() would check.  Use APCs to add new backends to
> > threads with free slots.
> I was planning to make it even easier and let Windows do the job for us,
> just using RegisterWaitForSingleObject(). Does the same - one thread per
> 64 backends, but we don't have to deal with the queueing ourselves.

Oh, good call -- I keep forgetting the native thread pool exists.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to