On 10/22/07, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trevor Talbot wrote:
> > I'd probably take the approach of combining win32_waitpid() and > > threads. You'd end up with 1 thread per 64 backends; when something > > interesting happens the thread could push the info onto a queue, which > > the new win32_waitpid() would check. Use APCs to add new backends to > > threads with free slots. > > I was planning to make it even easier and let Windows do the job for us, > just using RegisterWaitForSingleObject(). Does the same - one thread per > 64 backends, but we don't have to deal with the queueing ourselves. Oh, good call -- I keep forgetting the native thread pool exists. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
