Ühel kenal päeval, R, 2007-10-19 kell 15:42, kirjutas Joe Conway: > Decibel! wrote: > > On Oct 18, 2007, at 11:17 PM, Joe Conway wrote: > >> > >> Seriously though, I can change it for 8.3, but is it really worth > >> back-patching? > > > > I think it'd be worth changing for 8.3. While C forces you to worry > > about memory, SQL does not, so I bet this is a surprise to most folks. > > I don't think anyone has ever noticed -- certainly not enough to > complain in the past 5 years. This behavior has been the same since day > one. I don't mind changing it, but I don't see it as a big deal.
Most likely nobody ever uses un-named connection beyond initial testing. -------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings