Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I inquired about this problem elsewhere, it's not a bug, it's an API change. > > Until postgres "ports" to the new API it won't work with newer versions of > > Flex. > > If their intent was to break things, why wasn't this called flex 3.0? > Or at least 2.6? Calling it a minor version bump has to violate a > truth-in-advertising law or two.
Or something else like "glex", since it doesn't really look much like flex any more... I don't know whether it will be possible to port to the new API and still have postgresql compile with the old API. Incidentally, for anyone else compiling on debian there's a flex-old package. I can't install it because of some other dependencies, so i just reverted to the old flex. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster