Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Answer = sane == 'fill buffer, don't overfill buffer' ? 'yes' : 'no';
> :-)
> Seriously, I will add comments when I submit the revised patch to 
> demonstrate the loop invariants etc. so nobody need get worried when 
> reading the code.
> As for session end logging, I'm leaning in favor of a new 
> log_session_end or log_connection_end boolean, so that there is minimal 
> backwards compatibility impact. (Interestingly, that is actually the 
> only part of this stuff that is of any use to me right now).

Agreed.  A separate boolean is more self-documenting than 0/1/2.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to