Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I have not heard from you why we should make it harder (split across two
> > lines), except for consistency with log_statement and log_duration
> > outputs.
> That is exactly my argument.  I'll freely admit that it's not a strong
> point, but I find the claim that the inconsistent formats will be easier
> to parse to be a much weaker argument, in the absence of any attempt to
> make them *actually* easier to parse (like really truly one line).
> [ later ]
> > Should we instead convert newlines to "\n" and output the query as a
> > single line?
> That would shore up your position considerably.  It needs a little
> thought as to whether this would induce any confusion, and whether we
> really care if so.

Good, we are moving forward with something we both like.  Let me work up
a patch and post it.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
      subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to