> ! } while (!(z > 0 && z < MAX_RANDOM_VALUE));
>
> ! } while (z == 0 || z == MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
>
> This seems fairly ugly, since it eliminates the original coding's
> positive guarantee that the final result is in 0 < x < 1. Does your
yes, ugly :-(
> compiler manage not to choke if we add a cast instead?
>
> } while (!(z > 0 && z < (long) MAX_RANDOM_VALUE));
>
this does unfortunately not help, have also tried all sorts of other casts :-(
Would we be happy with the following, which would work ?
} while (z <= 0 || z == MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
