> > Would we be happy with the following, which would work ? > > } while (z <= 0 || z == MAX_RANDOM_VALUE); > > I suppose this doesn't? > } while (z <= 0 || z >= MAX_RANDOM_VALUE);
Ah, yes ! That also works and is a lot nicer. Can you please apply ? Together with the patch in Bruce's queue, the only minor open issue is now with the -i switch for postmaster in the getaddrinfo_all area (on this machine a direct nameservice request answers "host not found"), and the geometry and horology regression expected files. Thanks Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
