Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch does the following:
> 1. Comment on 5 new objects:
> [ etc ]
Reviewed and applied. Couple things I didn't like:
* You were using a bare C string as the amname argument in COMMENT ON
OPERATOR CLASS. This won't do because the parse tree is not a valid
Node structure; copyObject will fail on it. I inserted makeString()
and strVal() calls to fix it.
BTW, a simple test to detect uncopiable-parsetree problems is to compile
with COPY_PARSE_PLAN_TREES defined. Doing so revealed that you're not
the only person to have made this mistake lately --- ALTER SEQUENCE is
broken too.
* I made the macros LARGE and OBJECT be LARGE_P and OBJECT_P; they
seemed just a little too ripe for conflicts as-is ...
* The pg_dump code for COMMENT ON OPCLASS pretty obviously had not been
tested :-(
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
