Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think we ever discussed it, but it seemed logical and a minimal > change to the code. We already have a GUC write of non-default values > for exec and no one had issues with that.
For the record, I think that is ugly as well :-) Anyway, I'm not necessarily arguing that using shmem is the right way to go here -- that was merely an off-the-cuff suggestion. I'm just saying that whatever solution we end up with, ISTM we can do better than writing out + reading in a file for /every/ new connection. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
