Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My next question would have been to ask whether switching to a > spinlock here will be a performance problem. In looking at the code, > it seems we only hold the ShmemIndexLock for a long time (hundreds of > instructions & multiple system calls) while bootstrapping the shmem > index hash table itself. Otherwise, the lock is acquired and released > quickly, and even then it is only done during backend initialization, > so there shouldn't be much contention for it. Is this analysis > correct?
Yes, at least that was the theory I was working from when I suggested Claudio do it this way ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])