> I think the original complaint was misguided and we should not do > anything about it. IIRC the complaint amounted to "I have hundreds of > schemas and it annoys me that \dn shows them all". How is this > different from putting hundreds of tables into one schema and then being > annoyed because \dt shows them all? We have other mechanisms available > for making \dn selective (ie, you can use a name pattern). If \dn is > restricted to showing only schemas in your search path, it will become > useless.
I completely agree. It's like saying that \l should only show databases you are currently connected to... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
