Tom Lane wrote: > Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Most of the patch deals with the documentation, which is rather ugly > > because it keeps telling about "INSTEAD" vs "non-INSTEAD" rules, as there > > is no name for the default behavior. I think "ALSO" fixes this issue as it > > clarifies the explanations. > > Hmm ... I find that argument much more convincing than any of the others > ... > > Jan, what do you think? You invented this command's syntax IIRC.
I thought the syntax came from Berkeley. We can add ALSO if folks like it. I can't think of cases where we have keywords for both on and off behavior, and allow a default if the keyword is missing. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
