Tom Lane wrote:
> Fabien COELHO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Most of the patch deals with the documentation, which is rather ugly
> > because it keeps telling about "INSTEAD" vs "non-INSTEAD" rules, as there
> > is no name for the default behavior. I think "ALSO" fixes this issue as it
> > clarifies the explanations.
> Hmm ... I find that argument much more convincing than any of the others
> ...
> Jan, what do you think?  You invented this command's syntax IIRC.

I thought the syntax came from Berkeley.  We can add ALSO if folks like
it.  I can't think of cases where we have keywords for both on and off
behavior, and allow a default if the keyword is missing.

  Bruce Momjian                        |
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
      joining column's datatypes do not match

Reply via email to