> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] notice about costly ri checks (3) > > I hope you put version (4), not version (3)! Otherwise the new > wording is not the "new new one" discussed later...
I just checked. You put version 3 in line (NOTICE, no precision about offending attributes), although a later discussion seemed to decide that a WARNING was better, and that attributes and types should be shown, hence version (4). So, if you can update, it would be better! Sorry for the inconvenience, have a nice day, -- Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html