Thanks.  Done.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fabien COELHO wrote:
> 
> > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] notice about costly ri checks (3)
> >
> > I hope you put version (4), not version (3)! Otherwise the new
> > wording is not the "new new one" discussed later...
> 
> I just checked. You put version 3 in line (NOTICE, no precision about
> offending attributes), although a later discussion seemed to decide that a
> WARNING was better, and that attributes and types should be shown, hence
> version (4).
> 
> So, if you can update, it would be better!
> 
> Sorry for the inconvenience, have a nice day,
> 
> -- 
> Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
>                http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
> 

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to