Thanks. Done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fabien COELHO wrote: > > > > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] notice about costly ri checks (3) > > > > I hope you put version (4), not version (3)! Otherwise the new > > wording is not the "new new one" discussed later... > > I just checked. You put version 3 in line (NOTICE, no precision about > offending attributes), although a later discussion seemed to decide that a > WARNING was better, and that attributes and types should be shown, hence > version (4). > > So, if you can update, it would be better! > > Sorry for the inconvenience, have a nice day, > > -- > Fabien Coelho - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
